Miroslav Antić

ANTIC.org-SNN

Russia, Serbia are objects of overt pressure

leave a comment »


tass.com

TASS: Russian Politics & Diplomacy – Russia, Serbia are objects of overt pressure

5-6 minutes

Advertisements

Written by Mika

24. februara 2018. at 09:34

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

The difficulties of exchanging territory in the Balkans

leave a comment »


The Economist explains

The difficulties of exchanging territory in the Balkans

If Kosovo and Serbia swap parcels of land, the process won’t end there

The Economist explains

Feb 19th 2018

by T.J.

TEN years ago Kosovo declared independence from Serbia. Its Albanians, who make up the majority of the population, have been celebrating. But its Serbs, most of whom live in enclaves, have not. Serbia does not recognise Kosovo, which used to be its southern province, and Kosovo Serbs still consider themselves citizens of Serbia. The situation is typical of the Balkans, where borders are, frankly, a mess. So there are Serbs living in Kosovo and in Bosnia-Hercegovina, where they have their own republic (the Republika Srpska), Albanians and Bosniaks (Muslims) living in Serbia, and Greeks living in Albania. Recently the Serbian authorities proposed a discussion about an exchange of territory with their Kosovo Albanian counterparts. Is this a sensible idea?

In 1923 Greece and Turkey agreed to exchange some 2m people. Mostly Greek-speaking Christian Orthodox citizens of Turkey were sent to Greece, and Muslims from Greece were sent to Turkey. It was a brutal relocation, but, note its defenders, Greece and Turkey have not fought a war since. The only place where Greeks and Turks have fought is Cyprus, where their populations remained mixed. This has inspired nationalists in the western Balkans. Between 1918 and the late 1950s, many Muslims were encouraged to leave Yugoslavia for Turkey. But at the time of Yugoslavia’s collapse in the 1990s it still contained a thorough mix of peoples. Leaders in those Yugoslav wars saw ethnic cleansing as the best way to create new nation-states unpeopled by troublesome minorities. By 1995 historically Serb-populated regions of Croatia were empty and hundreds of thousands of Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks had similarly been turfed out of their homes in Bosnia. But the countries that emerged from the implosion did not neatly encircle Serbs, Albanians, Croats and so on. Myriad Serbs may have fled Kosovo after its war, but some 120,000 remain.

Latest stories

20180217_wom974.png

The Serbian authorities want to discuss taking Kosovo’s northern part, with Albanian-inhabited regions of Serbia moving to Kosovo in exchange. Proponents of such “map-tidying” say that multi-ethnic states have failed in the Balkans. But they ignore the fact that, once governments start down this path, the process has no obvious end and pays no heed to the human rights of everyone involved. If Kosovo and Serbia begin serious talks about a redrawing of their borders, the impact on Balkan communities apart from those in the affected parts of Kosovo and Serbia could be profound. Bosnian Serb leaders would hold a referendum on the future of the Republika Srpska; Bosnian Croats would follow suit; and Bosniaks would then fight to prevent the dismemberment of their shared country. Over the border Serbia would clamp down on Bosniak nationalists in Sandzak who dream of incorporating that region into a Greater Bosnia. Meanwhile Albanians in western Macedonia and Montenegro would demand to join a Greater Albania. Proponents of that idea would also like to incorporate parts of northern Greece, whereas Greek nationalists would demand part of southern Albania.

One irony behind the mooted exchange is that most Kosovo Serbs actually live in enclaves in the south of Kosovo. So the agreement would not leave them living in Serbia, and they would probably have to leave their homes or else be driven out. But Serbian officials may be less concerned about their countrymen than about taking steps towards recognising Kosovo—and thus making their own hoped-for accession to the European Union (EU) easier. It may not concern them that an exchange of territories in the western Balkans could have huge ramifications. Hungarian nationalists, after all, remain unreconciled to the loss of Transylvania to Romania, and Romanian nationalists would like to redraw their borders to take in Moldova. There is a reason that “Balkanisation” has a bad name. As in the EU at large, lessening the relevance of national borders would seem wiser than redrawing them and, in the words of one senior EU official, “opening the gates to hell”.

https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2018/02/economist-explains-11

Written by Mika

19. februara 2018. at 12:05

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

In Kosovo, a Peace Built on Separation

leave a comment »


nytimes.com

In Kosovo, a Peace Built on Separation

Marc Santora

7-9 minutes

Written by Mika

31. januara 2018. at 08:33

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

Kosovo for “Europe”: Washington’s “Balkans Policy” and the Fut ure of Serbia

leave a comment »


globalresearch.ca

Kosovo for “Europe”: Washington’s “Balkans Policy” and the Future of Serbia | Global Research

By Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirović

19-24 minutes

Written by Mika

30. januara 2018. at 09:44

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

Serbia Ruling Party Opens Office at Concentration Camp

leave a comment »


balkaninsight.com

Serbia Ruling Party Opens Office at Concentration Camp :: Balkan Insight

Filip Rudic

4 minutes

Written by Mika

25. januara 2018. at 10:26

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

Geopolitical poker in the Western Balkans

leave a comment »


ekathimerini.com

Geopolitical poker in the Western Balkans | Comment

ALEXIS PAPACHELAS

4-5 minutes

Written by Mika

14. januara 2018. at 10:39

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

World’s Eyes on Kosovo Amid Push to Halt War Crimes Court

leave a comment »


nytimes.com

World’s Eyes on Kosovo Amid Push to Halt War Crimes Court

Barbara Surk

8-10 minutes

Written by Mika

13. januara 2018. at 10:46

Objavljeno u Uncategorized