Miroslav Antić


Archive for decembar 2014

How the CIA Launched the «Financial Pearl Harbor» Attacks on Rus sia and Venezuela

leave a comment »

How the CIA Launched the «Financial Pearl Harbor» Attacks on Russia and Venezuela

Wayne MADSEN | 20.12.2014 | 00:00
Central Intelligence Agency director John Brennan’s long familiarity with Saudi Arabia, owing to the time he spent there as the CIA station chief in Riyadh in the 1990s and his knowledge of Saudi oil operations, has paid off. Petroleum industry insiders claim that Brennan’s agents inside Saudi Aramco convinced the firm’s management and the Saudi Oil Ministry to begin fracking operations in order to stimulate production in Saudi Arabia’s oldest oil fields. The Saudis, who are not known for their hands-on knowledge of their nation’s own oil industry, agreed to what became an oil pricing catastrophe which would not only affect Saudi Arabia but oil producing nations around the world from Russia and Venezuela to Nigeria and Indonesia.

By pumping high-pressure salt water into older wells, some at a depth of three to six thousand feet, an inordinate amount of pressure was built up. The CIA’s oil industry implants knew what would occur when the fracking operations began. Due to the dangerously high water pressure, the Saudis were forced continuously pump oil until the pressure became equalized. That process is continuing. If the Saudis ceased pumping oil, they would permanently lose the wells to salt water contamination. In the current "pump it or lose it" situation, the Saudis are forced to pump at a rate that may take up to five years before they can slow down production rates to pre-glut levels.

The corporate media, including the Bloomberg and Dow Jones virtual business news monopolies, issued news reports claiming that the Saudis agreed to keep production high at the November meeting of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in order to retain their market share amid increased U.S. oil production from fracking.

The net result of the CIA-inspired fracking operations, which the Saudis were warned not to pursue by petroleum engineers working for some foreign-based firms like Schlumberger, is that there will be an oil supply glut for the next 5 years. The glut will be followed by a reduction in Saudi oil production unless new oil fields are brought on line. There is now a major push by U.S. and Canadian oil companies to bring online the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to the United States to offset the expected sharp rise in oil prices in four to five years. But with Canada suffering financially from the drop in oil revenues, the Keystone XL project is also on financially shaky ground.

The CIA operation to frack Middle Eastern oil fields was not only limited to Saudi Arabia. Oil industry sources have revealed that similar fracking caused over production problems in Kuwait and Iraq.

The CIA’s sabotage of Saudi and other oil fields is not a first for the agency. In 1982, a massive and devastating explosion of the Trans-Siberian Pipeline was said to have been the work of Trojan horse software implanted by a Canadian company on behalf of the CIA. Former U.S. Air Force Secretary Thomas Reed, who served in the Ronald Reagan White House, confirmed the CIA’s role in the industrial sabotage. The CIA cooperated with the Israeli Mossad in creating the Flame computer virus that crippled Iran’s nuclear enrichment equipment. Another CIA-Mossad virus, Stuxnet, had wreaked havoc on nuclear power plants around the world.

The CIA is believed to have played a part in the crash of the Russian-made Sukhoi Superjet 100 in May 2012 in Indonesia. A Russian military intelligence spokesman said that U.S. industrial sabotage in downing the flight, which killed 45 Indonesian and Russian nationals, was considered a likely cause. The crash came after the head of the Russian space agency, Roskosmos, said he believed that it was possible that the failure of the Phobos-Grunt mission to the moons of Mars may have been caused by American sabotage.

The CIA’s use of industrial sabotage against the Cuban sugar industry, the Chilean and Zambian copper industries, and the Haitian rice industry is legendary. Explosions at oil refineries in Iran, Argentina, Mexico, Ecuador, and Venezuela, pipeline explosions in Syria and Libya, and a Brazilian Petrobras marine oil rig collapse, have been attributed to CIA proxy terrorist groups.

The result of the sudden decline in oil prices has resulted in heavy damage to the economies of the CIA-targeted countries of Russia, Iran, and Venezuela. Brennan and his economic warfare operatives absolutely banked on the Saudi over-production to harm the economies of all three countries and the CIA has not been disappointed. The CIA figures that «regime change» would bring to power pro-U.S. governments in Russia, Venezuela, and Iran.

Already, from his base in Switzerland, exiled Russian tax evader billionaire Mikhail Khodorkovsky has called for President Vladimir Putin’s violent overthrow and even his assassination. Meanwhile, the U.S. Congress took its cues from the CIA and voted to impose devastating economic sanctions on both Russia and Venezuela. President Barack Obama approved the congressional sanctions. Similar congressional legislation to increase sanctions on Iran is pending.

Russia has been harmed the most by the CIA’s Saudi oil production scheme. The Russian ruble fell 56 percent in value against the U.S. dollar while Russian interest rates climbed to 17 percent. The price of shares of Russia’s largest lending bank, Sberbank, fell 18 percent. Although the Russian economic collapse has resulted in financial ripples around the world, with Austrian and French banks losing their stock values and the value of the Polish zloty and Hungarian forint falling against the dollar, the Obama administration says that there will be no easing on economic sanctions imposed on Russia over Ukraine. Obama has also put the individual and institutional investments of American holders of Russian bonds in dire jeopardy.

The Pacific Investment Management Company’s (PEBIX) Emerging Markets Bond Fund, which holds over $800 million in Russian bonds, has lost almost 8 percent in value in the past few weeks.

Meanwhile, basic staples in Venezuela, including cooking oil, rice, and corn flour, are becoming hard to obtain. On the Venezuelan black market, the U.S. dollar has jumped 1700 percent in value against the Venezuelan bolivar. The CIA is using the financial collapse to push for an undemocratic overthrow of the Venezuelan government and CIA operatives are providing cash payments to Venezuelan opposition politicians and provocateurs.

Iran, which has been under punitive Western economic sanctions for a number of years over its nuclear power program, is probably best able to weather the storm. Iran has built up a rather impressive domestic food production, telecommunications, and oil industry infrastructure to survive the sanctions. However, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani appears very aware of the Saudi role in the conspiracy to drive down oil prices. Recently, Rouhani said of the drop in oil prices, "The main reason for [it] is political conspiracy by certain countries against the interest of the region and the Islamic world and it is only in the interest of some other countries . . . Iran and people of the region will not forget such conspiracies.»

The economic hardships imposed on oil-producing Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim country, has resulted in an opportunity for the Islamic State to gain adherents in the country, especially among the young and unemployed population. The economy of China, which is hoping to begin pumping oil from lucrative marine reserves in the South China Sea, is feeling the strain of lower oil prices. Mexico, wracked with social instability, has also suffered from the CIA’s machinations. However, instability in Mexico has always been advantageous for the CIA, which continues to benefit from the illegal drug trade that keeps the agency’s slush fund accounts flush with cash.

Brennan’s and the CIA’s industrial sabotage of the Saudi industry will continue to have far-reaching effects on the world economy. Oil industry insiders fear that the CIA has unleashed something that may deal a devastating blow to the global economy from which it will be difficult to recover.



Written by Mika

23. decembra 2014. at 13:22

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

US-Cuba deal ‘new front for Russia war’: Analyst

leave a comment »

US-Cuba deal ‘new front for Russia war’: Analyst

Daniel Estulin says restoring relations with Cuba is one of the few possibilities that the US has to upset the new Russian order.

Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:24PM GMT


The United States sees the restoring of relations with Cuba as a “new front in its war against Russia” and upsetting the Russian interests, a political analyst says.

“I think what has gone under the radar as far as the Cuba-America agreement is concerned, a lot of people are taken by surprise, but in fact this is one of the few possibilities that the United States has to actually upset the new Russian order,” Daniel Estulin, author and presenter from Madrid, told Press TV in an interview on Sunday.

Speaking from the White House on Wednesday, President Barack Obama announced the end of what he acknowledged was a decades-long "rigid" policy of isolation of Cuba.

According to Estulin, everything the Western “oligarchy” has thrown at Russia in the last decade and a half has failed.

The West has tried and failed to contain Russia through color revolutions, massacres of children, inflation, putting drugs throughout the country, embargos, wars, regime change attempts, NATO build-up around Russia, oil deflation and currency speculation, the analyst said. “All of that has failed.”

“And again what we are seeing is the only opportunity the United States has for this asymmetrical warfare against Russia that still might win and get the upper hand through Cuba, get at the whole Latin America,” Estulin continued.

“The whole idea of the agreement between Cuba and the United States has very little to do with bringing down this blockade [of Cuba]. It has to do with pragmatism on the part of America’s ruling class, and the idea is to take over what Russia did not take over in its time such as Cuba… and use it as a spear point to destroy Russia’s interests in Latin America.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin is “selling Russian oil and gas only for physical gold and this is called check-mate, ladies and gentlemen, the game is over,” Estulin said.

“This is something that the Americans understand, and that’s why the decision to reach the agreement is coming right now.

“For example, in the third quarter alone, Russia has purchased 55 out of the 93 tones of physical gold purchased by the central banks of all countries in the world. In other words, more than half of all the gold purchased was purchased by Russia."

The “twist of Putin’s game,” according to Estulin, is that the mechanism for the sale of Russian energy to the West only for gold works regardless of whether the West agrees to pay for Russian oil and gas."

“The suppression of gold prices by the special department of the United States government, called the Exchange Stabilization Fund, with the aim of stabilizing the dollar has been made into law in the United States and that’s something that Russia has flaunted and has found a way around it again by using their natural resources in exchange for gold.

“This is again the key reason why the United States right now decided it needed to open up a new front against Russia and this is the whole United States-Cuba agreement.”

Estulin noted that “the global market for physical gold is extremely small” compared to the market for paper gold; “$360 billion per month are traded in paper gold and only $280 million a month are traded in physical gold.”

“The West has spent as much of its efforts and resources to artificially increase the purchasing power of the dollar and lower oil prices and artificially lower the purchasing power of gold but the problem for the West is that the stocks of physical gold in possession of the West are not unlimited,” he said.

“Russia poses a real threat to the American model of petro-dollar world domination,” he added.

“The question remains how long will the West be able to buy oil and gas from Russia in exchange of physical gold and what will happen to the United States’ petrodollar after the West runs out of physical gold to pay for Russian oil, gas and uranium.

“The answer to this question is the key element of this United States-Cuba agreement. It has nothing to do with openness. It has to do with typical American cynicism, opening up a new front in its war against Russia for the American model of survival,” Estulin concluded.



Written by Mika

22. decembra 2014. at 11:11

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

US House Votes Overwhelmingly for ‘New Cold War’ With Russia

leave a comment »

US House Votes Overwhelmingly for ‘New Cold War’ With Russia
Ron Paul

Last week the US House voted overwhelmingly in favor of an anti-Russia resolution so full of war propaganda that it rivals the rhetoric from the chilliest era of the Cold War. Ironically, much of the bill condemns Russia for doing exactly what the US government has been doing for years in Syria and Ukraine! For example, one of the reasons to condemn Russia in the resolution is the claim that Russia is imposing economic sanctions on Ukraine. But how many rounds of sanctions has the US government imposed on Russia for much of the past year? I guess sanctions are only bad when used by countries Washington doesn’t like.

Written by Mika

12. decembra 2014. at 09:36

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

A Russophobic Rant From Congress

leave a comment »

A Russophobic Rant From Congress
Patrick J. Buchanan

Hopefully, Russians realize that our House of Representatives often passes thunderous resolutions to pander to special interests, which have no bearing on the thinking or actions of the U.S. government. Last week, the House passed such a resolution 411-10. As ex-Rep. Ron Paul writes, House Resolution 758 is so "full of war propaganda that it rivals the rhetoric from the chilliest era of the Cold War." H. R. 758 is a Russophobic rant full of falsehoods and steeped in superpower hypocrisy … Russia is charged with using "trade barriers to apply economic and political pressure" and interfering in Ukraine’s "internal affairs." This is almost comical. The U.S. has imposed trade barriers and sanctions on Russia, Belarus, Iran, Cuba, Burma, Congo, Sudan, and a host of other nations.

Written by Mika

12. decembra 2014. at 09:35

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

Putin Pipeline Moves and EU Stupidity

leave a comment »

Putin Pipeline Moves and EU Stupidity

Column: Economics

Region: Middle East

Country: Turkey

South Stream, the $45 billion project to deliver Russian natural gas via underwater pipeline through the Black Sea to Bulgaria and on to other Balkan and southern European markets, is dead. Russian President Vladimir Putin made the death pronouncement on December 1, during a trip to Turkey to meet Turkish President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. It has major geopolitical and economic consequences for the EU.

As Putin explained, “If Europe doesn’t want to realize this, then it means it won’t be realized. We will redirect the flow of our energy resources to other regions of the world. We couldn’t get necessary permissions from Bulgaria, so we cannot continue with the project. We can’t make all the investment just to be stopped at the Bulgarian border,” Putin said. “Of course, this is the choice of our friends in Europe.”

The Russian President didn’t waste a minute to show how he plans that redirection. The real loser is not Russia, but the EU who managed yet again to shoot themselves in the foot by their buckling under to Washington pressure from Victoria Nuland’s State Department and the Obama Administration hawks. The South Stream would have provided secure delivery to southern EU countries including Bulgaria, Hungary, Austria, Italy, Croatia and also Serbia. It would avoid the current transit pipelines running through Ukraine. Similarly, to avoid a repeat of the US-induced Ukrainian disruptions of Russian gas to the EU in 2009, Russia and Germany agreed the construction of Nord Stream, also avoiding Ukraine.

Now, by forcing Bulgaria, an EU member, to halt South Stream, using blackmail of a Bulgarian bank bailout last June, the EU has made itself dependent on gas security via Ukraine, a country the EU’s own political spinelessness has helped turn into a failed state ruled by a cabal of Brussels-and-Washington backed gangsters and oligarchs. We might use the term “stupid” to describe EU policy on South Stream, were it not for the fact at the end of the day Washington blackmail on the EU caused the South Stream blockage policy to be implemented, just as the economically devastating EU Russia sanctions were imposed only after extreme pressure on Berlin and Paris by Washington.

Bringing Turkey closer to Eurasia

Russia and Turkey have just signed an agreement to expand the existing Russian Blue Stream gas pipeline to Turkey by an immediate 3 billion cubic meters to the current 13.7 bcm of gas pumped to Turkey via Blue Stream, for a total near 17 bcm.

Putin also announced a fascinating new option, to build a gas hub on the Turkish-Greek border to supply Europe with gas to compensate for the loss of South Stream. He told the press, “We are ready to not only expand the Blue Stream, but to build another pipeline system to supply the growing demand of the Turkish economy, and if it is deemed justified, to set up an additional gas hub for the South European consumers on Turkish territory, near the border with Greece.”

Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller revealed that he has signed a memorandum of understanding on building a new Turkey-bound pipeline under the Black Sea, with capacity to pump 63 billion cubic meters to Turkey, about equal to the now-defunct South Stream.

If we follow the motion of his feet and not so much his mouth, Erdogan is above all a pragmatic political survivor. Internal conflict, above all with the CIA-linked Fetullah Gülen movement as I detail in Amerikas Heiliger Krieg, has increased distance between Erdogan and Washington despite Turkey’s NATO membership. Until now, Washington’s neo-conservatives Richard L. Morningstar, now Ambassador to Azerbijan, had relied on an obedient Turkey as an alternative to carry gas or oil from Azerbaijan independent of Russia.

If Erdoğan accepts the Russian offer of forming an energy alliance, it would mark a sharp policy change for Turkey, a geopolitical shift of immense importance and Erdogan knows as much, even if he seems to have a confused idea of a clear strategy for Turkey. A Russian-Turkey energy hub on the Greek border would signal a decisive change of strategy by Erdogan. A significant hint of that was contained in the statement that the new gas supplies to Turkey from Russia will be paid in local currencies, not in the US dollar. Turkey already is Russia’s largest foreign gas customer after Germany. Erdogan has also asked to be accepted in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization led by Russia and China.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”
First appeared:

Written by Mika

11. decembra 2014. at 11:09

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

Pravo lice lažnih prijatelja: Nemačkoj i SAD trebaju resursi Rusije i neće stati dok je ne sruše

leave a comment »


Pravo lice lažnih prijatelja: Nemačkoj i SAD trebaju resursi Rusije i neće stati dok je ne sruše

Piše: Džems Petras
Ideološki centar imperijalne ekspanzije i osvajanja SAD i Nemačke u Evropi i Kavkazu jeste „ruska pretnja“. To je ono što definiše neprijatelje i saveznike. Mete su države koje ne podržavaju sankcije. Masovni mediji ponavljaju laži. Nema sumnje da će Rusija pod opsadom biti primorana na žrtve. Oligarsi će pobeći na zapad, dok će se liberali zavući ispod kreveta. Ali isto kao što su Sovjeti preokrenuli rat u Staljingradu, ruski narod će preživeti i ponovo postati nada za sve one koji žele da se reše tiranije SAD/NATO-a i Nemačke/EU.

Osnovna nacistička ideološka potpora koja je osigurala masovnu finansijsku i političku podršku nemačkih vodećih industrijalista bila je komunistička i sovjetska pretnja. Glavni nacistički vojni nagon bio je usmeren na istok i na uništenje Rusije. „Ruska pretnja“ je opravdala osvajački pohod nacističke Nemačke i okupiranje Ukrajine, Balkana, istočne Evrope i baltičkih država.

Nakon pobede, podele i razoružanja Nemačke i proširenja sovjetske moći, SAD su ponovo postavile nacističke industrijske i bankarske gigante, zvaničnike i obaveštajne operativce. Prvi cilj je bio obnova domaće ekonomije i učvršćivanje političke moći.

Do kraja šezdesetih godina, Nemačka je povratila ekonomski primat u Evropi dospevši na čelo evropske „integracije“ u saradnji sa Francuskom i Engleskom. Zatim je usledilo kreiranje Evropske unije. EU je služila kao instrument Nemačke za tiho osvajanje. Godinu po godinu, kredit po kredit, EU je olakšala probijanje nemačkog kapitalističkog tržišta i finansijsku ekspanziju kroz južnu i centralnu Evropu. Nemačka je zatim ostvarila ekonomsku dominaciju nad zapadnom i istočnom Evropom zahvaljujući pomoći od strane SAD.

Grandiozno uzdizanje Nemačke: Aneksija istočne Nemačke i poraz SSSR

Jačanje nemačke moći ne bi bilo moguće da nije došlo do aneksije istočne Nemačke. Nemačka se odjednom transformisala od potencijalnog uticajnog partnera EU u najdinamičniju ekspanzionu silu u Evropi, pogotovo u ekonomijama Varšavskog pakta.

Aneksija istočne Nemačke i zbacivanje komunističkih vlasti na istoku omogućilo je nemačkim kapitalistima da ostvare dominaciju nad tržištima u bivšem Istočnom bloku. Kao najveći partner, ona je preuzel kontrolu nad većim industrijskim preduzećima putem koruptivnih privatizacija i novopostavljenih prokapitalističkih režima. Kako su Češka, Poljska, Slovačka, Mađarska, Bugarska i države Baltika „privatizovale“ i „denacionalizovale“ svoje strateške ekonomske, tržišne, medijske i društvene sektore usluga, „ujedinjena“ Nemačka je uspela da se vrati na svoje privilegovano mesto. Pošto je Rusija pala u ruke gangstera, oligarha i političkih zastupnika zapadnih kapitalista, čitava njihova industrijska infrastruktura je desetkovana i Rusija je pretvorena u ogroman region za izvoz sirovina.

Nemačka je promenila svoje tržišne odnose sa Rusijom sa jednakih na „kolonijalne“: Nemačka je izvozila skupe industrijske proizvode, a uvozila gas, naftu i sirovine iz Rusije.

Nemačka vlast se eksponencijalno širila nakon aneksije „druge Nemačke“, povratka kapitalizma u istočnu Evropu i porasta broja klijenata voljnih da se predaju Evropskoj uniji.

Nemačka političko-ekonomska ekspanzija putem „popularnih revolucija“ propraćena je vojnom ofanzivom SAD. Nemačka je intervenisala u Jugoslaviji, potplaćujući separatiste u Sloveniji i Hrvatskoj. Zatim je podržala SAD/NATO bombardovanje Srbije i ultradesničarsku Vojsku za oslobođenje Kosova (KLA), uključenu u teroristički rat na Kosovu. Beograd je pobeđen, a promena režima je dovela do neoliberalne klijentske države. SAD su zatim napravile najveću vojnu bazu u Evropi na Kosovu. Crna Gora i Makedonija su postale sateliti EU.

Dok se NATO širio i pojačavao vojno prisustvo SAD na granicama Rusije, Nemačka je postala istaknuta ekonomska sila Evrope.

Nemačka i Novi svetski poredak

Dok su predsednici Buš i Klinton zagovarali „novi svetski poredak“, zasnovan na unipolarnoj vojnoj dominaciji, Nemačka je gurala svoj imperijalni poredak koristeći politiku i ekonomiju. Oba centra moći, Nemačka i SAD, delili su zajednički cilj formiranja novih kapitalističkih režima u svojim regionalnim organizacijama – EU i NATO. Odjednom su u Nemačku u Englesku pristizali milioni iskusnih imigranata koji su radili po nižim cenama.

Američko-nemačka vojna i ekonomska dominacija u Evropi je imala za plan da Rusiju održi kao slabu kvazi vazalnu državu uz kontinualan ekonomski rast svojih ekonomija.

Za SAD, nepobitna vojna dominacija nad Evropom bila je odskočna daska za imperijalnu ekspanziju na Bliskom istoku, u južnoj Aziji, Africi i latinskoj Americi. NATO je „internacionalizovan“ u ofanzivan globalni vojni savez: prvo u Somaliji, Avganistanu, zatim Iraku, Libiji, Siriji i u Ukrajini.

Uzdizanje Rusije, islamski otpor i Novi Hladni rat

Tokom „decenije sramote“ (1991-2000), ekstremne mere privatizacije od strane klijentskih vladara u Rusiji pridodale su čitavoj ekonomiji, javnoj riznici i nacionalnom nasleđu. EU i SAD su definisali Rusiju kao ogromnu vazalnu državu bez funkcionalne ekonomije. Postkomunistička Rusija, propala država, dobila je naziv „liberalna demokratija“.

Slučajno uzdizanje Vladimira Putina i postepeno smenjivanje neoliberalnih zvaničnika, ali i rekonstrukcija ruske države, što je najvažnije, postalo je pretnja vojnoj dominaciji SAD i ekonomskoj ekspanziji Nemačke. Pokrenula se ruska tranzicija ka suverenoj i nezavisnoj državi, a zatim i kontraofanziva SAD i EU. Isfinansirana je politička opozicija s pokušajem da se ponovo vrati vazalstvo Rusije putem demostracija i izbora. Pokušaji da se Putin svrgne su propali. Ono što je uspelo sa Jeljcinom i Gorbačovom nije bilo efektivno protiv Putina. Velika većina Rusa nije želela još jednu deceniju sramote.

Početkom novog veka, Putin i njegov tim su postavili novi set pravila po kojima oligarsi mogu da zadrže svoje bogatstvo i konglomerat pod uslovom da ne koriste svoju ekonomiju da preuzmu vlast. Putin je zatim oživeo naučne, tehničke, vojne, industrijske i kulturne institucije i centralizovao odluke o pitanjima trgovine i ulaganja u širokom krugu bez obaveze prema Zapadu. Treće, počeo je da procenjuje i ispravlja pretnje koje su dolazile iz pravca Zapada, konkretno po pitanju Kavkaza, Čečenije, Ukrajine i Gruzije.

Na početku je Putin optimistično pretpostavio da će, obzirom da je Rusija kapitalistička država, normalizacija i stabilizacija države biti pozdravljena od strane SAD i EU. On je čak pomislio da će Rusiju prihvatiti kao ekonomskog, političkog, pa čak i NATO partnera. Putin je planirao i saradnju sa NATO-om i EU. Zapad nije pokušavao da razuveri Putinove želje, čak ga je i ohrabrio.

Pošto su propale strategije za obaranje Putina, počela je njegova konstantna demonizacija. Zapad je započeo politiku izolovanja, potkopavanja i okruživanja Rusije, odvajajući je od njenih trgovinskih partnera.

SAD i Nemačka protiv Rusije: Proizvodnja „Ruske pretnje“

Rusija je bila namamljena da podrži ratove SAD i NATO-a u Iraku, Avganistanu i Libiji u zamenu za obećanje dublje integracije sa zapadnim tržištem.

SAD i EU su prihvatili saradnju Rusije, uključujući vojne zalihe, puteve i baze, kako bi okupirali Avganistan. NATO snage su osigurale podršku Rusije u sankcijama protiv Irana. Počele su da se odvijaju takozvane „obojene revolucije“ u Gruziji, što je bila proba za puč u Ukrajini 2014. godine. Svaki uspeh svrgavanja vlasti donosio je novog antiruskog vladara spremnog da služi Nemačkoj i SAD.

Nemačka je predvodila evropsko imperijalno napredovanje na Balkanu i u Moldaviji, državama sa jakim ekonomskim vezama sa Rusijom. Visoki nemački zvaničnici posetili su Balkan u pokušaju da učvrste svoje odnose sa vazalskim režimima u Sloveniji, Bugarskoj, Slovačkoj i Hrvatskoj.

Evropska unija je naredila svom bugarskom vazalu Bojku Borisovu da blokira izgradnju ruskog cevovoda Južni tok koji bi prolazio kroz Srbiju, Mađarsku, Sloveniju itd. Bugarska je na taj način izgubila 400 miliona dolara godišnjeg prihoda. Slično je učinjeno i u Moldaviji, koja je izgubila 150 miliona dolara u izvozima za Rusiju.

Mađarska, Srbija, Slovenija, Moldavija i Bugarska uzbunile su se zbog toga što će njihove ekonomije stradati, ali ipak Nemačka ima prednost u svojim interesima nad svojim vazalskim državama.

Kao što Nemačka pojačava svoju antirusku ekonomsku kampanju, tako SAD putem NATO-a pojačavaju gomilanje vojske na granicama Rusije.


Ono što je apsolutno jasno je da SAD i Nemačka pokušavaju da povrate vazalni status Rusije iz devedesetih godina. Oni ne žele „normalne odnose“. Od trenutka kada je Putin započeo oživljavanje ruske države i ekonomije, zapadne sile su počele sa serijom političkih i vojnih intervencija, eliminišući ruske saveznike, trgovinske partnere i nezavisne države.

Pojava ekstremističkih, visceralnih i antiruskih režima u Poljskoj, Letoniji, Estoniji i Litvaniji poslužila je za napredovanje NATO-a i ekonomsko zadiranje Nemačke. Onaj cilj koji je nekada imao Hitler sada sprovodi kancelarka Merkel ekonomskom ucenom Balkana i nasilnim prevratima u Ukrajini i Gruziji.

Nemačka ekonomska vladajuća klasa je danas podeljena na dominantni pro-SAD sektor koji je voljan da žrtvuje svoju blagorodnu trgovinu sa Rusijom u nadi da će ostvariti potpunu dominaciju u Rusiji posle Putina i manjinski industrijski sektor, koji želi da se sankcije završe i povrate normalni ekonomski odnosi sa Rusijom.

Nemačka se plaši da bi ekonomske žrtve na Balkanu mogle da dovedu do preokreta, te zato podržava ubrzano postavljanje NATO snaga, kako bi se stalo na put izmišljenoj „ruskoj pretnji“, a u stvari da bi se podržali vazalni režimi.

Ideologija „ruske pretnje“ je ponovna pojava doktrine koju je Hitler koristio da obezbedi podršku domaćih industrijskih bankara, konzervativaca i desničarskih kolaboracionista među ekstremistima u Ukrajini,Mađarskoj, Rumuniji i Bugarskoj.

Preuzimanje vlasti putem korumpiranih oligarha od strane SAD i EU je pokrenulo trenutnu krizu. Preuzimanje vlasti u Ukrajini je glavna pretnja po postojanje Rusije kao nezavisne države. Nakon preuzimanja Kijeva, NATO se zaputio ka jugoistoku i Krimu kako bi potpuno eliminisao rusku stratešku poziciju pri Crnom moru. I pored svega toga, Rusija je prozvana „agresorom“.

SAD i Nemačka ozbiljno shvataju osvajanje Ukrajine, jer je to ključno za ofanzivu koja će ugušiti rusku ekonomiju putem sankcija. Strateški cilj je da se svrgne Putin i povrati vazalni status Rusije. Imperijalna elita SAD i Nemačke smatra da će uz kontrolu Rusije uspeti da izoluje i napadne Kinu sa zapada i sa istoka.

Oni su do te mere spremni na taj podvig da će iskoristiti i nuklearno oružje po potrebi.

Ideološki centar imperijalne ekspanzije i osvajanja SAD i Nemačke u Evropi i Kavkazu jeste „ruska pretnja“. To je ono što definiše neprijatelje i saveznike. Mete su države koje ne podržavaju sankcije. Masovni mediji ponavljaju laži. Nema sumnje da će Rusija pod opsadom biti primorana na žrtve. Oligarsi će pobeći na zapad, dok će se liberali zavući ispod kreveta. Ali isto kao što su Sovjeti preokrenuli rat u Staljingradu, ruski narod će preživeti i ponovo postati nada za sve one koji žele da se reše tiranije SAD/NATO-a i Nemačke/EU.


Written by Mika

8. decembra 2014. at 16:19

Objavljeno u Uncategorized

New York Times propagandists exposed: Finally, the truth about Ukraine and Putin emerges

leave a comment »

New York Times propagandists exposed: Finally, the truth about Ukraine and Putin emerges

NATO was the aggressor and got Ukraine wrong. Many months later, the media has eventually figured out the truth

Patrick L. Smith

Vladimir Putin (Credit: AP/Mark Lennihan/Photo montage by Salon)

Well, well, well. Gloating is unseemly, especially in public, but give me this one, will you?

It has been a long and lonely winter defending the true version of events in Ukraine, but here comes the sun. We now have open acknowledgment in high places that Washington is indeed responsible for this mess, the prime mover, the “aggressor,” and finally this term is applied where it belongs. NATO, once again, is revealed as causing vastly more trouble than it has ever prevented.

Washington, it is now openly stated, has been wrong, wrong, wrong all along. The commentaries to be noted do not take on the media, but I will, and in language I use advisedly. With a few exceptions they are proven liars, liars, liars — not only conveying the official version of events but willfully elaborating on it off their own bats.

Memo to the New York Times’ Moscow bureau: Vicky Nuland, infamous now for desiring sex with the European Union, has just FedExed little gold stars you can affix to your foreheads, one for each of you. Wear them with pride for you will surely fight another day, having learned nothing, and ignore all ridicule. If it gets too embarrassing, tell people they have something to do with the holidays.

O.K., gloat concluded. To the business at hand.

We have had, in the last little while, significant analyses of the Ukraine crisis, each employing that method the State Department finds deadly: historical perspective. In a lengthy interview with Der Spiegel, the German newsmagazine, none other than Henry Kissinger takes Washington carefully but mercilessly to task. “Does one achieve a world order through chaos or through insight?” Dr. K. asks.

Here is one pertinent bit:

Written by Mika

7. decembra 2014. at 10:34

Objavljeno u Uncategorized